Opinion | Audio books > music. – Korinthian, 2008-09-10 at 23:13:54 (8 comments) |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:14:28, Korinthian wrote... I guess you could say that I'm not a hardcore music listener. I much prefer listening to a good book. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:15:57, Baslisks wrote... @Korinthian: Why not read a book. It's quicker than book son tape anyways. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:16:58, Korinthian wrote... @Baslisks: Because you can't do other things while reading a book. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:18:31, Nevermore wrote... I read for pleasure, meaning I like to find a comfortable spot and curl up with a good book. I don't like to do something else while listening to a book. Doesn't sound appealing to me, and I fail to see how it could be better than listening to music. I'm a music fiend. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:19:42, Korinthian wrote... @Nevermore: It's nice while travelling, or walking. I read books too, though. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:20:21, Baslisks wrote... @Korinthian: would you dance to a book? I can't focus on audio books and do other things. Music fits me better. I read while walking and on the metro. |
![]() | On 2008-09-10 at 23:36:09, BorgClown wrote... @Korinthian: I get too immersed on the stories that I can't multitask while reading. I'd love audiobooks if I couldn't read anymore, but for now, I read on my PDA. It's like a pocket library. |
![]() | On 2008-09-11 at 04:00:22, Beeba wrote... i don't like audio books. i prefer the narration of my internal voices. and also music is awesome. |